In today's fast-paced digital world, there is a demand for web applications to be fast, reliable, and responsive even with heavy loads. The right practice for load testing is highly indispensable for an application's good performance when there is a heavy user load. This blog delves into Locust - the open-source tool which has a lot of popularity these days as it is easeful and effective for load testing.
Load testing simulates user traffic to determine how an application will behave given different amounts of demand. For most of these important reasons, load testing is fundamentally important because it helps identify potential performance bottlenecks: it shows where and why the application is slowing or crashing under heavy traffic, and this is usually fixed before it affects the users.
Reliability: Testing the application under varied conditions of loads will ensure that applications remain reliable and responsive during peak times.
Prevent Costly Downtime: Failure to withstand the performance conditions can result in loss of revenue and loss of customer confidence. Load testing enables organizations to avoid such risks because it ensures the robustness of the system.
Meeting SLAs and Customer Expectations: The usage of load testing validates whether the application will meet the performance and uptime metrics promised to clients or users.
Load testing forms part of a rich history, starting as far back as 1960 from the use of mainframe computers, when organizations realized they needed to be sure to confirm whether their early computer systems had the capacity to handle all the very important functions of the business without interruption. As technology advances, it was clear that structured load testing were needed. Thus, load testing was set off rolling by the rapid web applications growth in the late 1990s and soon commercial tools, mainly LoadRunner, took over the market, allowed business to simulate traffic loads, and finally, discover the bottlenecks in their system. The complexity of applications led open-source tools like Apache JMeter, adapted from the early 2000s to offer much flexibility, being cost-free, and more versatile for various protocols. However, the new cloud-native, distributed systems could not be used efficiently by traditional load testing tools; thus, there were demands for lightweight, easy-to-adapt solutions.
Carl Bystrom founded Locust in 2011 and based his solution on Python, building it into an open-source, extremely user-friendly load testing tool. There were three core tenets which dominated the design: writing test scenarios in Python - a quite readable and popular language; testing shall be spread over many machines to generate greater user loads; and availability of real-time online interface for on-the-fly control and monitoring of the tests. Locust's openness allowed it to grow really fast with contributions from the communities and was especially popular among agile development teams.
Today, Locust is extremely relevant for contemporary load testing that is tightly integrated within DevOps workflows, CI/CD pipelines, and cloud environments. Distributed architecture within the Python-based scripting makes Locust flexible and dynamic to adapt to the complexity of API-driven and microservices-based applications. Locust is slowly but surely becoming the tool of choice of testers, developers, and DevOps engineers, the gateway toward scalable, flexible testing that matches the high dynamic demands of the complex software environment.
Locust is the most powerful and user-friendly load testing tool for web applications, written in Python and accessible to anyone familiar with the language, providing a very simple way to write load tests, yet flexible.
Key Benefits of Using LocustSimplicity and Readability : Locust scripts are in Python, so they are easy to read and can be modified. Users define tasks, simulate a variety of user behaviors, and add custom scenarios in little effort.Web-Based UI: Locust has a web-based UI as well. From the UI, users manage parameters of a test in real-time and view metrics; this offers simplicity to testers by changing user counts and ramp-up rates, and seeing live results from tests.Distributed Testing: Locust supports distributed load testing on multiple machines. This can therefore be used to generate considerable load over applications.User Behavior Customizable: Using Locust, users can test different user actions and flows, ranging from simple requests to more intricate interactions that could reflect real-world situations.Open-Source: This is free-to-use and open-source, thus accessible to small businesses and start-ups or teams with a low resource constraint.
To get started with Locust-based load testing, a user must: First, install Locust using pip. And, define the scenarios of a test by writing a locustfile.py script.Install locust
pip3 install locust
Validate your installation
locust -V
Here is a simple example setup
from locust import HttpUser, task
class HelloWorldUser(HttpUser):
@task
def hello_world(self):
# Adding a User-Agent header to mimic a browser request
self.client.get("/login", headers={"User-Agent": "Mozilla/5.0"})
self.client.get("/in/LoginHelp", headers={"User-Agent": "Mozilla/5.0"})
To run the test, simply execute:
locust -f locustfile.py --host=http://example.com
Total users to simulate: It is recommended that for Locust distributed, the initial number of simulated users must be greater than number of user classes times number of workers. In our case, we used 1 user class and 3 worker nodes.
Hatch rate: In instances where hatch rate is lower than the number of worker nodes, it would hatch in "bursts" where all worker node hatched a single user, then sleep for several seconds, hatch another user, sleep and so on.
If the number of workers on the dashboard exceeds the number of worker nodes available, redeploy the dashboard with the required number of worker nodes/instances
After swarming for a while, your dashboard will look something like this
Requests: Total number of requests made so far
Fails: Number of requests that have failed
Median: Response speed for 50 percentile in ms
90% ile: Response speed for 90 percentile in ms
Average: Average response speed in ms
Min: Minimum response speed in ms
Max: Maximum response speed in ms
Average size (bytes): Average response size in bytes
Current RPS: Current requests per second
Current Failures/s: Total number of failures per second
Your graphs will look something like this:
These graphs can be downloaded using the download icon next to them.
You can download the data under the download data tab.
You can analyze the graphs based on response and volume metrics.
Average response time measures the average amount of time that passes between a client’s initial request and the last byte of a server’s response, including the delivery of HTML, images, CSS, JavaScript, and any other resources. It’s the most accurate standard measurement of the actual user experience.
Peak response time measures the roundtrip of a request/response cycle (RTT) but focuses on the longest cycle rather than taking an average. High peak response times help identify problematic anomalies.
Error rates measure the percentage of problematic requests compared to total requests. It’s not uncommon to have some errors with a high load, but obviously, error rates should be minimized to optimize the user experience.
Concurrent users measure how many virtual users are active at a given point in time. While similar to requests per second (see below), the difference is that each concurrent user can generate a high number of requests.
Requests per second measures the raw number of requests that are being sent to the server each second, including requests for HTML pages, CSS stylesheets, XML documents, JavaScript files, images, and other resources.
Throughput measures the amount of bandwidth, in kilobytes per second, consumed during the test. Low throughput could suggest the need to compress resources.
As applications are becoming more complex and comprise microservices and native cloud architecture, load testing will be the critical piece to ensure both performance and reliability. The current trends that shape the future of load testing and the role Locust plays in it are:
Integrating with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD): Load testing is increasingly integrated into CI/CD pipelines ensuring every deployment adheres to determined performance standards. Locust is friendly with automation workflows.Cloud load testing with Locust Teams can then set up this environment in clouds, thus simulating real-world traffic and ensuring application scaling from different infrastructure configurations.Enhanced Protocol Support Locust might have community-driven plugins or updates support more protocols than HTTP as it grows in popularity, hence making it more useful in modern applications.Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: AI would soon be integrated with load testing tools that can also analyze the results, identify trends, and predict existing performance issues while making even smarter load testing strategies.
Conclusion In a nutshell, Locust's load testing functionality provides developers, testers, and DevOps teams with all the necessary features to ensure that the application they are about to deploy is going to face real-world demands since it becomes an effective tool to evaluate application readiness. An approach based on Python, easy setup, and support for distributed testing helps satisfy the requirements of modern applications, which are cloud-native and microservices-based. The real-time interface can assist teams in monitoring tests live; it may update them dynamically as required-it is applicable, for instance, in agile and CI/CD environments where the performance test must be very sensitive to changes. Of course, no tool is flawless, but due to its openness and the active community involved, choosing Locust on your path towards optimizing the performance and scalability of your application with a very high user experience will not leave you wrong. Increasingly complex software systems will always mean that the importance of tools like Locust will come to hold in future, toward responsive and reliable applications and maintaining high qualities.